View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 2003

 

 

I.                    CALL TO ORDER

 

A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Liberty, Missouri was held in the Council Chambers at City Hall on September 22, 2003 with Mayor Stephen P. Hawkins presiding.  Mayor Hawkins called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

 

II.            INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

            The invocation was given by Council Member Coni Hadden, who then led the pledge of allegiance.

 

III.       ROLL CALL

 

Roll call was answered by Mayor Stephen P. Hawkins; Ed Collins and Coni Hadden, Ward I; Anna Marie Martin, Ward II; Lyndell Brenton and Juarenne Hester, Ward III; and Bill Parker and Jim Robertson, Ward IV.  Also in attendance were Patty Gentrup, City Administrator; Steve Hansen, Public Works/Development Services Director; Steve Anderson, Planning & Development Manager; Jackie Carlson, Planner; Jackie Norton, Administrative Secretary; Linda Tyree, Finance Director; Kathy Goode, Assistant Finance Director; Craig Knouse, Police Chief; Chris Deal, Parks & Recreation Director; Gary Birch, Fire Chief; Sara Ott, Assistant to the City Administrator – Human Resources; Lyndsay Heal, Management Assistant; Jane Sharon, Deputy City Clerk; George Kapke, Legal Services Provider; Angie Borgedalen, Liberty Tribune; Joe Cook, Liberty Sun News; and 19 members of the public.

 

IV.            APPROVE MINUTES AND SUMMARIES

 

A.                 REGULAR SESSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003

 

Council Member Robertson moved to approve the minutes as distributed.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried 6-0-1.  Council Member Lyndell Brenton abstained, due to absence.

 

B.                 EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 8, 2003

 

Council Member Hester moved to approve the minutes as distributed.  Council Member Hadden seconded the motion, which carried 6-0-1.  Council Member Lyndell Brenton abstained, due to absence.

 

C.                 STUDY SESSION MEETING SUMMARY OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2003

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the meeting summary as distributed.  Council Member Hester seconded the motion, which carried 6-0-1.  Council Member Lyndell Brenton abstained, due to absence.

 

V.            CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION

 

Mayor Hawkins recognized Boy Scout John Cameron, with Troop 320, working on his Citizenship in the Community badge.

 

Barbara Lozier, representing Tree Liberty, spoke about a grant the organization had recently received to plant trees in the Dougherty Historic District.  She stated that the state grant requires a forty percent match from the organization.  Ms. Lozier indicated that Dig Rite would be marking utilities in the rights of way, so the planting could commence.  The Dougherty Historic District was chosen because if the relatively short time frame within which the organization could apply for funds.  With a homes association in place in neighborhood and given many trees were lost in the area as a result of the tornado, this district was selected.  She stated that between 65 and 75 trees would be planted in early November.  A fund-raising campaign called “Re-leaf Liberty” has been launched.

 

Ms. Lozier also noted that one of the goals of Tree Liberty is to clean up Mount Memorial Cemetery and then implement a tree planting next spring, following a design by Patti Banks.  Another goal of the organization is for Liberty to become a Tree City USA.  She stated that one of the requirements for this is the development of a comprehensive urban forestry program, which the group hopes to implement in 2004, during the city’s 175th anniversary.  Ms. Lozier noted that the final component in being able to apply is a tree ordinance, which City staff is working on.

 

Lastly, Ms. Lozier stated, as a member of the Park Board, she appreciated the opportunity to attend the recent conference, which provided much useful information for the Park Board’s discussions.

 

Council Member Martin asked what types of trees would be planted.  Ms. Lozier stated there would be at least three species – maple, ash and something of a fruit-bearing variety.  She stated this is the first phase, because they want to include oaks, which must be planted in the spring.

 

Bobbi Roman stated she lives on South Jewell and asked for City consideration of repairs needed to the curbs on her street.  She stated that she realizes that sidewalks are the responsibility of the homeowner, but the curbs needing repair are near the railroad tracks and are a safety hazard.  Mayor Hawkins asked staff to look into the situation.

 

VI.            MEETING SCHEDULE

 

Mrs. Gentrup stated that there would be a study session on Monday, September 29, beginning at 7:00 p.m.

 

VII.            CONSENT AGENDA

 

A.        APPOINTMENTS

 

Park Board

Appoint Jim Cooper to fill vacancy for term expiring 06-01-04.

 

Council Member Brenton moved to approve the appointment.  Council Member Robertson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

B.         AUTHORIZE EXECUTIVE SESSION TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 22, 2003 IN THE COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE REGULAR SESSION TO DISCUSS CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS AS AUTHORIZED BY 610.021(12) RSMo - MOTION

 

Council Member Brenton moved to approve the executive session.  Council Member Robertson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

VIII.            PUBLIC HEARINGS

 


A.        *ELDERLY APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT  - NOTTINGHAM MANOR - CONSISTING OF 144 UNITS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF FOREST AVENUE, NORTHEAST OF M-291 HWY. [Applicant: Kaw Valley Engineering/ Roundtable LLC] (item # 1 and #2 do not require public hearings)

 

Planning & Development Manager Steve Anderson stated that the preliminary plat was one lot on approximately four acres.  This and the final plat are the site for proposed elderly apartments on the east side of 291 along Forest.  He stated that, in 1987, the property was rezoned to the north for garden style apartments, in the middle for office space and the southern part of the property as highway commercial district.  He stated that there was adequate access to sanitary sewer, but a 4” water main was not considered adequate and would have to be upgraded to an 8” main.  The storm water would be handled through facilities easements.  Mr. Anderson stated that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of both the preliminary plat and the final plat.

 

Council Member Parker asked about a signal at 291 Hwy. and Forest.  Mr. Anderson said one is not warranted with this development.

 

Council Member Brenton asked if storm water is the same as that going through the Triangle and down through Glenaire.  Mr. Hansen said it is and is adequate to add this development.  He stated that the Storm Water Master Plan had looked at this area specifically.  Mr. Brenton asked if a basin would be added for this development.  Mr. Anderson said one would be added and there is not one there now.

 

1.            PRELIMINARY PLAT  - RESOLUTION [CASE NO. 03-2001PP]

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the preliminary plat.  Council Member Hadden seconded the motion, which carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2143.

 

2.            FINAL PLAT – ORDINANCE [CASE NO. 03-2002FP]

 

Document No. 6114 was read.  Council Member Hadden moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hester moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 2144.

 

3.            SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT – RESOLUTION [CASE NO. 03-1099SUP]

 

Mr. Anderson reviewed the proposal for a 144-dwelling units, exclusively for the elderly.  He stated that this can come under the special use permit portion of the Zoning Ordinance; otherwise an application for rezoning the property would be required.  He stated that the adequate facilities ordinance applies to the application and improvement of Forest all the way to 291 Hwy. would be required, including the addition of a turn lane.  Mr. Anderson said that a signal at Forest and 291 Hwy. would not be warranted with this development, but would probably be added when the connection was made into a four-way intersection.  He stated there would be a fee in lieu of parkland dedication and sidewalks would be added on Forest to 291 Hwy.  He stated the parking planned meets city standards as well.

 

Mr. Anderson stated this type of use is preferable to development as the property is currently zoned.  A detention basin would be to the south of the property.  Mr. Anderson noted the buildings face Forest and relate to the street with parking and drop-off areas in the back (on the west side of the buildings.)  He said the character of the buildings lend themselves to fronting the street with the buildings set back 25 feet from Forest to accommodate shade trees.

 

Mr. Anderson stated this elderly apartment development relates to the apartment development being proposed for the east side of Forest.  He said the seven findings have been met for a special use permit.  He stated the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat and final plat and had a tie vote (3-3) on the special use permit recommendation, with three stipulations: that the public works permits be issued for the street improvements prior to a building permit being issued; that the public works permits be issued for improvement of an existing 4” water line along Forest to an 8” main from 291 Hwy. through the site prior to building permits being issued; and prior to occupancy, the drive approach that serves St. Stephen’s Lutheran Church must be relocated such that it aligns with the southern entrance into this development.

 

Council Member Martin asked why the realignment would be required for the church entrance.  Mr. Anderson stated there were grading issues and the applicant had proposed the realignment to line up with the entrance at the apartment development.  Mrs. Martin asked if the sidewalks would end at the north end of the development.  Mr. Anderson said they would.  Mrs. Martin asked for clarification of a signal not being warranted at Forest and 291 with this development.  Mr. Anderson stated that none would be warranted with the elderly apartment development, but a revised study to MoDOT would be a part of development on the east side of Forest.  Mrs. Martin asked if the funds in lieu of parkland dedication would be used for gardens.  Mr. Anderson stated that there is a green area between the buildings, there would be a looped sidewalk around the development and benches at some locations.  Mrs. Martin asked about the minimum age to live in the apartments.  Mr. Anderson said it was 55 to qualify.

 

Council Member Hester stated she thought this was an excellent use of the site, but asked why a special use permit was being pursued, instead of rezoning the property.  Mr. Anderson stated that the applicant would have to pursue a rezoning if the apartments were not restricted to elderly apartments as proposed.  He said the apartments would have a different character if elderly only, and the applicant elected to request the special use permit for this purpose.

 

Council Member Hadden asked about the 4 ft. wide sidewalks and the cross walk at Forest and Nottingham.  Mr. Anderson said that would be a way for pedestrians to cross Forest.  Council Member Brenton asked if the traffic study was the same one done in 2000.  Mr. Anderson said it was and no signal had been warranted with 176-unit development proposed then; staff was comfortable with no warrant for a signal with this proposed development.  He added that a development on the east side of Forest would trigger a new study.  Mr. Brenton asked about compliance, if there is a violation of the special use permit.  Mr. Anderson said that staff would contact the applicant and require that either the buildings be returned to elderly only in operation or that an application be made for rezoning of the property.  If neither was done by the applicant, the staff would address the situation.  Mr. Brenton asked if there would be fines for violations.  Mr. Anderson said there might be or Municipal Court would address the violations.  He said the applicant’s intent is to keep the apartments restricted for elderly only.

 

Mr. Brenton asked about parking on Forest.  Mr. Anderson said parking on Forest would not be allowed.  Mr. Brenton asked why not when the front of the buildings were to be so close to Forest.  Mr. Anderson said there is no room to add a drop-off in front of the buildings as there is 25 ft. from the curb to the building; the drop-off area is in the back.  Mr. Brenton asked how this compared to the a


single family residence.  Mr. Anderson said the setback is 30 ft. plus the right-of-way for houses.  Council Member Martin asked how much parking is designated.  Mr. Anderson said normally there are two spaces per unit in a regular apartment development, but with a designated elderly apartment development, the parking is figured at 0.6 per unit.

 

Mayor Hawkins opened the public hearing and asked if anyone present wished to speak in favor of the application.  Michael Osbourn, Kaw Valley Engineering, 14700 W. 114th Terrace, Lenexa, Kansas, introduced Joe Duffey, Roundtable LLC, Don Rosenmann, Rosemann & Associates Architecture.  He stated they had worked with staff for several months to reach a good conclusion and had agreed to the stipulations.  Council Member Brenton asked if transportation would be provided.  Mr. Osbourn stated there would be vans available full time at the apartments for use by the residents to shop or for group activities away from the apartments.  He stated at this point, the residents are less dependent on personal cars and like transportation being provided.  Mr. Brenton asked if the transportation is fee-based.  Mr. Osbourn stated it is included in the monthly rent.

 

Council Member Hester asked if this is assisted living.  Mr. Osbourn said there are common areas in this building, but they are not formal.  Council Member Martin asked if the common area was in the lobby.  Mr. Osbourn said there is a common area on each floor and a garden area with each building.  Mrs. Hester asked if the rent is state-controlled.  Mr. Osbourn said the rent has not yet been defined.

 

Council Member Collins asked about the reason doors were placed on the Forest side.  Mr. Osbourn said that was based on input from the Planning & Zoning Commission.  Mayor Hawkins asked if the drives would be covered.  Mr. Osbourn said no.

 

Council Member Martin asked for clarification of the type of facility that is being planned.  Mr. Osbourn said it is independent living but no meals are provided.  Council Member Hester asked if the only distinction between assisted living and these elderly apartments would be the transportation.  Mr. Osbourn stated there would be more staff than in a standard facility.  Joe Duffey, Roundtable LLC, 1730 S. Withers Road, stated that the elderly is the most underserved and fastest growing population.  He said the development would provide entertainment, but would not provide housekeeping.  The staff would help with social needs of the residents.  Don Rosemann, Rosemann & Associates Architecture, 1526 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, Missouri, stated there would be cameras, alarms on the doors and a touch key pad or door swipe card for residents.

 

Council Member Brenton asked if they had given any thought to the drop-off being on the Forest side.  Mr. Rosemann stated that City staff had not wanted the drop-off on the Forest side with Nottingham becoming a collector street.  He stated they preferred the drop-off be in the back with the parking area.

 

Mayor Hawkins asked who would operate the apartments.  Mr. Duffey said Don Nye from Doe Run, Missouri has experience and would oversee the apartments.

 

Mayor Hawkins asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of the application.  Seeing none he asked if anyone present wished to speak in opposition to the application or had any questions.  Sandra Landuyt, 511 N. Forest, asked for a definition of elderly apartments and noted that New Beginnings is already in place, asking if this development would be similar.  Mr. Anderson stated these apartments would be available to those 55 years of age and older.  Ms. Landuyt asked what the rent would be.  Mr. Duffey said it would be at the market rate and there would not be any assisted rentals.  Ms. Landuyt asked about the utility/tree line.  Mr. Osbourn said a geotechnical report had not indicated any stability issues.  Ms. Landuyt asked how much Forest would be widened.  Mr. Osbourn said the street would go to 36’, keeping through traffic and there would be a median feature added at Nottingham to assist in traffic movement.  Ms. Landuyt asked how close to the existing property this development would be.  Mr. Anderson said it would be about 40 ft.  Ms. Landuyt asked for clarification of the street design.  Mr. Osbourn said it would be widened to the end of the property line and then narrow to the north of that to Nottingham.  Ms. Landuyt said 144 units seemed too dense for the area.  Mr. Osbourn said it was not considered too dense.

 

Mayor Hawkins asked if anyone else wished to speak to the application.  Seeing none, he closed the public hearing.

 

Mayor Hawkins asked if the tie vote with Planning & Zoning Commission required anything other than a simple majority for the Council to approve the special use permit.  Mr. Anderson said it did not.

 

Council Member Hadden asked where the Forest would narrow.  Mr. Osbourn said it would be at the intersection with Nottingham where the median feature would be added.  Mayor Hawkins asked if there would be signage regarding the location.  Mr. Osbourn said they could work with staff on that.

 

Council Member Brenton asked if the rear of the property is designed for water to go south rather than to the west.  Mr. Anderson said it was designed specifically to be funneled in that direction.  Mr. Brenton asked if traffic signs would be appropriate on Forest.  Mr. Anderson said that could be considered.  Mr. Brenton stated it seems likely cars will stop on Forest to let people off at the front doors.  Mr. Anderson said that the rear is designed for parking and the drop-off is clearly identified in the back.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the special use permit.  Council Member Robertson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2144.

 

IX.            ORDINANCES, CONTRACTS AND RESOLUTIONS

 

A.                ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF VENDOR PAYMENTS FROM SEPTEMBER 5, 2003 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 19, 2003 – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6115 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Hester seconded the motion.

 

Council Member Martin asked if the furniture purchased with check no. 78025 had gone out for bid.  Mrs. Gentrup stated they had sought bids as part of the fire station remodeling project.

 

Council Member Brenton asked what advertisement had been done through the yellow pages (check no. 78045).  Parks & Recreation Director Chris Deal stated the ad was for the theater rentals and occasionally includes the Community Center.  Mayor Hawkins asked if the ads were for the Liberty book.  Mr. Deal said the ad was placed in the Kansas City metro area yellow pages produced by Southwestern Bell.

 

Council Member Martin asked if it is typical to pay the period of time included in check no. 78197.  Mrs. Gentrup stated the City pays when invoiced.  Mrs. Martin asked if check no. 78128 was reimbursement.  Mrs. Gentrup said it was.

 

Vote on the motion was as follows:  Council Member Collins – yes; Council Member Martin – yes; Council Member Hester – yes; Council Member Parker – yes; Council Member Hadden – yes; Council Member Brenton – yes; Council Member Robertson – yes.  The motion carried unanimously; it was approved by the Chair and inscribed in Ordinance No. 8580.

 


B.         *PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NEW 176-UNIT NOTTINGHAM POINTE APARTMENT COMPLEX AND CLUBHOUSE LOCATED ON AN EXTENSION OF NOTTINGHAM DRIVE WEST TO FOREST AVENUE - RESOLUTION [CASE NO. 03-1096PDP; Applicant: Kaw Valley Engineering/Roundtable LLC]

 

Mr. Anderson stated that, with this development, Nottingham was proposed to go through the development and connect to Forest.  He stated that in the late 1980s several developments had been proposed and one or two denied.  A development plan for patio homes was approved and built (the Village at Camelot).  A later application for a 175-unit apartment development was denied and led to a lawsuit and subsequent settlement agreement.  Storm water issues were addressed in the agreement and incorporated into the current application.  The previous application from 1999 was different with more buildings and fewer units.  Mr. Anderson stated the significant ridgeline dictated the layout.  He stated the development would require the completion of Forest Ave. improvements, construction of the extension of Nottingham and upgrade of the water line to an 8” line along Forest.  He stated that storm water would be capture on site and detained.  Mayor Hawkins asked if the water connection would be to the north.  Mr. Anderson said it would.

 

Mr. Anderson stated City standards require a grade for streets of no more than 8%.  Due to the requirement to tie in Nottingham at Forest, however, the grade would be 12% and would require a variance.  He stated it was determined that a 32’ wide street would be better for traffic calming.  He said all access drives had been reviewed for sight distances and safety.  The traffic flow at Nottingham and Forest was such that the design including the median was considered good for the transition at that point.

 

Mr. Anderson stated there would be a fee in lieu of parkland and conservation easements established in some areas that were previously shown as apartments.  In order to preserve open space, the trade-off, he said, was larger buildings.  Council Member Collins asked if the open space is mostly trees.  Mr. Anderson said that was correct.  He stated there would be pedestrian access throughout the development that would be fully connected with sidewalks.

 

Mr. Anderson stated that storm water would be caught in a detention basin in the southeast corner of the site, then going to a fully improved system from the basin to Clayview.  He stated the culvert under Nottingham would be upgraded to better handle storm water.  He stated that curbing, while not part of the development agreement, would be included on-site.  Mr. Anderson said there would be some relief across the grade to alleviate the slope.

 

Mr. Anderson reviewed the items included in the development agreement including:  improvements to Forest Avenue; upgrade of the water main from 4” to 8”; sidewalks add along Nottingham; improvements to the culvert and an above-ground system for storm water.  He stated that a signal at Forest and 291 Hwy. would be considered at the point a final plat comes forward; there would be two cuts into the development.  Mr. Anderson stated conservation easements would be added along with retaining walls, which would complement the design of the rest of the development.  He said some of the walls are as high as 19 feet.  He noted the buildings would be two and three stories.  He said shade trees would be added along Nottingham and open space would be preserved.  Mr. Anderson stated the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval.

 

Council Member Hester asked about the location of the 19’ wall.  Mr. Anderson stated the applicant had looked at the wall placement in great detail and the staff is confident the plan is appropriate.  Mayor Hawkins asked if the nature of the soil was a factor.  Mr. Duffey said there is a lot of rock and the wall is on the north side of Nottingham so it can meet up with Forest appropriately.  He said the wall would be similar to the one on 152 Hwy.

 

Council Member Martin asked if the trees would remain on the eastern edge to serve as a buffer.  Mr. Anderson said the trees may be a partial buffer but some of the development will be visible from Locust.  Mrs. Martin asked about the effect on Nottingham and Clayview traffic.  Mr. Anderson said that had been considered in the study and it is okay as signaled now.  Mrs. Martin asked where vehicles will enter the development.  Mr. Anderson said they would come in off Nottingham but this development may add traffic getting out onto Clayview.

 

Council Member Collins asked about the size of the culvert.  Public Works/Development Services Director Steve Hansen stated it is 84’ and would be upgraded to relieve the flow on the roadway.

 

Council Member asked why Unit # 116 is non-conforming.  Mr. Rosemann stated that it is due to the topography of the site on the south end.  Council Member Brenton asked about the ridgeline between the curb cuts.  Mr. Anderson said the sight distance had been addressed in the design and is adequate.  Mr. Brenton asked if plantings or a berm had been considered to address the effect on Hampton Court.  Mr. Anderson said that would be more appropriately addressed in the final engineering and final plat.

 

Mr. Brenton asked if there was a reason Nottingham couldn’t be pulled south to add distance between this development and the homes on Hampton Court.  Mr. Anderson stated that they had looked at many options and moving Nottingham south didn’t work with the grade and intersections.  Mr. Brenton said it appeared that if you moved Nottingham 7 to 10 feet south at the apex that would free some space.  Mr. Osbourn stated that the curve becomes tighter in the radius as the length of road is shortened.  This proposed design keeps the steepness down.  Mayor Hawkins asked what was to the north.  Mr. Anderson said it is the back yards of Hampton Court residences.  Mr. Duffey said the 19-foot wall is on their side, but they will do what they can.

 

Council Member Martin asked if all the property to the south is church property.  Mr. Anderson said it is and is owned by the developer.  Mrs. Martin asked if rents in these apartments would also be set at market rates.  Mr. Duffey said they would.

 

Council Member Collins moved to approve the preliminary plat and preliminary development plan.  Council Member Parker seconded the motion, which carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2145.

 

C.         *LIBERTY TRIANGLE

 

Mr. Hansen reviewed  the progress of the development in the Triangle, including the redevelopment of Project A, which is the Lowe’s Home Centers development.  He stated that the plan was brought to Council last December and is now ready for Council consideration.  He stated that, while a few minor issues remain to be finalized, the development agreement is sufficiently complete to be considered by Council.  He reviewed the elements of the development agreement, including property acquisition, option funds, the Lowe’s project itself, other pad site development within Project A and land use restrictions.  He stated that the state is now ready to transfer properties to the City.

 

Council Member Brenton asked for more specifics with respect to the state property being transferred.  Mr. Hansen stated it is along Stewart Road west of the roundabout, with significant sections coming back to the City.  Mr. Brenton asked if that would be done by quitclaim deed.  Mr. Hansen said they were looking at how it could be conveyed.  Nick Ventola, Integra Realty Resources, stated that discussions are continuing with the Missouri Department of Transportation.  He said the appraisals are done in the parcels identified as C and B-2.  He said the new commuter lot is expected to have about 91 spaces and the costs will include curb, guttering and lighting in addition to the land.  Mr. Brenton asked about the economics of the project.  Mr. Hansen stated that these land acquisitions constitute approximately 75,000 sq. ft. of property and if the commuter lot is added it will be about 240,000 sq. ft. of land being transferred to the City.  Mr. Brenton asked if the City would make the payments once the commuter lot property was transferred.  Mr. Hansen said it would not; some of the property would be transferred to additional developers and the costs would not be born by the City.  Mr. Brenton commented that the City was taking on a lot of roadway that may require upgrading.  Mr. Hansen stated that Conistor Road was done in conjunction with the 152 Hwy. project and Glenn Hendren and 152 Hwy. would be a combination of developers and new development paying the costs.  Mr. Brenton stated he wanted fair value.  Mr. Hansen stated the benefit would be the City having control of roadway and the land.  The signals and speed limits could now be controlled by the City, allowing the City to be more proactive.  The advantage to the state is in the reduction of some of its maintenance costs.  The City has the advantage of being able to turn over the property to developers without additional processes involving the state.  Mayor Hawkins asked if 152 Hwy. would still be state highway in this area.  Mr. Hansen said it would become Kansas Street around Conistor and Glenn Hendren would no longer be state highway, except where 291 Hwy. connects and where 152 Hwy. connects with the I-35 interchange.

 

1.            APPROVAL OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT A OF THE LIBERTY TRIANGLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT – ORDINANCE (SECOND READING)

 

Council Member Hadden moved to remove the item from the table for consideration.  Council Member Parker seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Document No. 5999 was read.  Council Member Hester moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 8581.

 

2.            TIF REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LOWE’S HOME CENTERS – ORDINANCE (SECOND READING)

 

Document No. 6106 was read.  Council Member Hadden moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Brenton seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 8582.

 

3.            QUITCLAIM DEED FROM THE MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6116 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Hadden seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Parker seconded the motion.  Council Member Robertson asked if there are future plans to widen the bridge, would the portion from Conistor to Clayview be done at the City’s expense.  Mr. Hansen said it would be but the contributions through the roadway development tax or other City funds would be available along with developer contributions, which would be established in the development agreement.  He noted that 152 Hwy. was just overlaid and is in the best condition possible.  Mr. Robertson asked if the widening would take the bridge to six lanes.  Mr. Hansen stated that is what is called for in the 1997 corridor study.

 

The motion carried 6-1-0 with Council Member Robertson voting in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 8583.

4.            RELINQUISHMENT OF ROADWAY AGREEMENT WITH MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6117 was read.  Council Member Hadden moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hester moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried 6-1-0 with Council Member Robertson voting in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 8584.

 

D.        AGREEMENT WITH THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MITIGATION PLAN FOR SOUTH LIBERTY PARKWAY PROJECT – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6118 was read.  Council Member Robertson moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Hester seconded the motion.  Council Member Collins asked if the $7,200 includes all costs.  Mr. Hansen stated this is the third cost associated with the project.  Mrs. Gentrup stated the total would be provided.  The motion carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 8585.

 

E.         PRISCILLA’S SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT - ORDINANCE

 

Legal Counsel George Kapke reviewed the background related to Priscilla’s opening a business in Liberty.  He stated that a building permit had been issued to a contractor to remodel the old McDonald’s on 291 Hwy. for a gift shop.  As the work progressed, staff discovered that it was Priscilla’s planning to open the business.  Mr. Kapke stated that staff sought additional information from the developer and owner; when this was not forthcoming, staff stopped the work at the site.  The business and property owners then sued in federal court.  The City opened discussions for a resolution.  The owner contends it is not an adult business as defined by City Code.  Adult businesses are defined in part as those selling sexually-oriented materials.  The City worked with the developer to see if it came within the definition including half of the space, half the inventory or half of the gross revenue from adult business items.  The developer and owner stated they would not meet the threshold, while the City stood ready to defend its ordinance.  Mr. Kapke stated the nature of this particular business appears not to meet the definition and the City could choose to challenge the suit or settle it with the understanding that the property and business owner would not operate an adult business.  Mr. Kapke stated the owners of the property and business agreed to the terms of the settlement agreement, including the following: the business owner would apply for a general occupation license; no one under the age of 18 would be admitted to the store unless accompanied by an adult; there would be no window displays or live modeling; and a portion of the store would be designated for adult products that would not exceed 10% of the gross store space and 20% of the retail space.  In addition, the business would provide quarterly reports for the first year and annually thereafter, showing sales of adult products do not exceed the 50%.  By sales of adult products exceeding 40% of sales, the business is admitting to being an adult business, which would not allow it to operate at that location.  The signage would be limited to the building itself.  If the business fails to comply with these terms, Mr. Kapke stated, it would be given a 30-notice to comply.

 

Mr. Kapke stated that upon Council approval of the settlement agreement, the City will promptly inspect work that has been done and once okayed by the inspectors, will allow the business to proceed with licensing and opening the business.  He recommended Council approve the agreement.

Council Member Collins stated that, since an 18-year old is considered an adult, a younger person could go in accompanied by an 18-year old.  Mr. Kapke said that is correct; he stated in a recent challenge, an adult is defined as age 18 or older.  Council Member Brenton asked if it is not enforceable, can there be a voluntary agreement between the applicant and the City.  Mr. Kapke stated that the store couldn’t exclude those individuals that are of the proper age, because that would be a form of discrimination.  The store cannot exclude 18-year olds, but it can state that anyone younger must be accompanied by a parent.

 

Council Member Collins stated that he would prefer this operation be somewhere else, but he realizes the City can’t enforce morality and so he is obligated to vote yes.

 

Document No. 6119 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Robertson seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Parker seconded the motion.  Council Member Brenton asked if those present in the audience could be given an opportunity to speak to the issue before Council.  Mayor Hawkins asked if anyone present wished to comment on the settlement agreement.  Seeing none, he returned the discussion to Council.  Mr. Brenton stated he echoed Council Member Collins comments and the Council is responsible for stewardship of the City’s funds.  Challenging this would be a poor investment of the citizens’ money.  The motion carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 8586.

 

X.            OTHER BUSINESS

 

A.        AUTHORIZATION FOR DOWNTOWN SQUARE STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION - MOTION

 

Council Member Hadden moved to approve the light installation.  Council Member Collins seconded the motion.  Council Member Hadden asked if staff had checked into selling the old lights.  Mr. Hansen said that had not been done yet.  He said the lights are city property so they could be sold.  The motion carried unanimously.

 

B.         PURCHASE OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR STOCKSDALE PARK FROM FRY & ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $33,372.00 – MOTION

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the purchase.  Council Member Brenton seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

XI.               MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR – Mrs. Gentrup stated she would be out of town over the next day and Steve Hansen would be acting city administrator in her absence.

 

XII.            MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

 

Council Member Robertson stated there are potholes along the entrance to the hospital grounds off Glenn Hendren.


XIII.            ADJOURNMENT

 

The meeting adjourned at 9:31 p.m.

 

 

                                                                                   

                                                                                                __________________________________

Mayor

Attest:

 

           

_____________________________________

Deputy City Clerk