View Other Items in this Archive | View All Archives | Printable Version

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES

MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2007

 

I.                    CALL TO ORDER

 

A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Liberty, Missouri was held in the Council Chambers at City Hall on August 27, 2007 with Mayor Robert T. Steinkamp presiding.  Mayor Steinkamp called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

 

II.         INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – HAROLD PHILLIPS

 

            The invocation was given by Council Member Harold Phillips who then led the pledge of allegiance.

 

III.       ROLL CALL

 

Roll call was answered by Paul Jenness and Harold Phillips, Ward I; Anna Marie Martin and Greg Duncan, Ward II; Lyndell Brenton and John Parry, Ward III; and Fred Foster and Nick King, Ward IV.  Also in attendance were Curt Wenson, City Administrator; Cynthia Boecker, Assistant City Administrator; Craig Knouse, Police Chief; Tim Moore, Police Lieutenant; Linda Tyree, Finance Director; Diana Adams, Special Project Manager; Steve Hansen, Public Works Director; Steve Anderson, Planning & Development Director; Rebecca Wymore, City Planner; Dan Fernandez, Planner; Katherine Burr, Planner; Tony Sage, Information Services Director; Brad Boone, Information Services Specialist; Amy Brusven, Human Resources Director; Shawnna Funderburk, Assistant to the City Administrator; Jane Sharon, Deputy City Clerk; George Kapke, Legal Services Provider; Jason Noble, The Kansas City Star; Angie Borgedalen, Liberty Tribune and 17 members of the public.

 

IV.       APPROVE MINUTES AND SUMMARIES (SEE CONSENT AGENDA)

 

A.        SPECIAL SESSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 20, 2007

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the minutes as distributed.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion which carried 7-0-1.  Council Member King abstained due to absence.

 

B.         STUDY SESSION MEETING SUMMARY OF AUGUST 20, 2007

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the meeting summary as distributed.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion which carried 7-0-1.  Council Member King abstained due to absence.

 

V.        CITIZENS’ PARTICIPATION

 

Mayor Steinkamp recognized Cub Scouts Pack 214 including Peter Boos, Gabe Biggs and James Bednar, who are all working on badges.

 

James Bednar, 608 Butternut asked, in light of the Minnesota bridge tragedy, if any bridges in Liberty are designated as structurally insufficient.

 

Pat Miller, 1955 Kings Highway, asked Council to permit citizens to speak during Council study sessions.

 

Jim St. John, 1200 Cross Lane, described poor street conditions in the Brookview Gardens neighborhood and asked Council to address the matter.

 

VI.       MEETING SCHEDULE

 

VII.      CONSENT AGENDA

 

A.        APPOINTMENTS

 

Fair Housing and Rehabilitation Committee

Reappoint Larry Wilson to a term expiring 09-01-2009

Reappoint Margaret James to a term expiring 09-01-2009

Reappoint Kenneth Endsley to a term expiring 09-01-2010

Reappoint Vern Cull to a term expiring 09-01-2010

Reappoint Jackie Murtha to a term expiring 09-01-2010

 

Liberty Preservation and Development Commission

Reappoint Allen Murray to a term expiring 09-01-2010

Reappoint Ralph Brant, Jr. to a term expiring 09-01-2010

 

Liberty Parks and Recreation Charitable Fund Advisory Committee

Appoint Julie Casel to a term expiring 01-01-2009

 

Parks and Recreation Board

Appoint Steve Schwegler to a term expiring 06-01-2009

Appoint Gary Moore to a term expiring 06-01-2008

 

Council Member King moved to approve the appointments.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

B.         REGULAR SESSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 13, 2007

 

Council Member King moved to approve the minutes as distributed.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

C.                 EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 20, 2007

 

Council Member Phillips asked that the Executive Session Minutes reflect he was in attendance.  Council Member King moved to approve the minutes.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

D.                 AUTHORIZE EXECUTIVE SESSION TO BE HELD AUGUST 27, 2007 IN THE COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE REGULAR SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION MATTERS AS AUTHORIZED BY 610.021(1) RSMo, REAL ESTATE MATTERS AS AUTHORIZED BY 610.021(2) RSMo, CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS AS AUTHORIZED BY 610.021(12) RSMo, AND PERSONNEL MATTERS AS AUTHORIZED BY 610.021(3) RSMo AND 610.021(13) RSMo – MOTION

 

Council Member King moved to authorize the meeting.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

VIII.     PUBLIC HEARINGS

 

A.        *ESTABLISH 2007 PROPERTY TAX LEVY – ORDINANCE

 

Special Project Manager Diana Adams reviewed the proposed 2007 tax levy of $0.9358 per $100 of assessed valuation.  Projected 2008 revenues from this levy ($4,519,288) funds services such as public safety, street maintenance, community improvements and development and parks and open space maintenance.  Addressing council questions, Ms. Adams stated the tax levy was increased by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) each year plus new construction, which for 2007 were 2.6 percent and 2.4 percent respectively.  She noted state law requires the levy be adjusted so as not to receive a windfall.  Between the CPI and new construction, the 2007 tax levy is less than the 2006 levy but will provide a projected five percent increase in property tax revenues.  It was also noted that all cities have difficulty bringing the levy forward for consideration, due to the county and state reviews required and the deadline of September 1 for submitting the approved levy.

 

Mayor Steinkamp opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak.  Fay Bedinger, 232 W. Franklin, stated she hoped the levy was more understandable to the others than it was to her.  Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Mayor Steinkamp closed the public hearing and returned discussion to the Council.

 

Document No. 6723 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member King seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ord No. 9181.

 

B.         *AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 30, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, OF THE LIBERTY CITY CODE – ORDINANCE (continued from June 25, 2007)

 

City staff received several Council requests for clarification of the procedure by which the proposed sign amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) would be considered by Council.  Staff asked that the public hearing and consideration of the UDO amendments be continued to allow staff to clarify Council direction.  Council Member Martin moved to continue the public hearing and consideration of the amendments to the September 10, 2007 regular session.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Planning & Development Director Steve Anderson stated that several Council members had asked staff about the manner in which the proposed amendments would be considered.  Staff requested Council provide direction pertaining to the manner in which the UDO amendments would be presented.  Following review of a staff memo, Council directed staff to bring the amendments forward as one ordinance; remove the reference to tracts of land contiguous to rights of way in relation to pole signs and address billboards in a future study session.

 

C.         VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDERS

 

1.         *AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 30, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, OF THE LIBERTY CITY CODE PERTAINING TO VIDEO SERVICE PROVIDERS – ORDINANCE (SECOND READING)

 

Planner Dan Fernandez reviewed the amendments to the UDO that would regulate the placement and buffering/landscaping of utility boxes.  The Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the amendment by a vote of 8-0.

 

In response to Council questions, Staff noted that the ordinance wording provided by the City’s special legal counsel would allow some flexibility in interpretation and places the burden on the utility to demonstrate how box placement in the rear yard is not practical.  Any inspection fees would be identified in the City’s budget.  It is anticipated that there will be case law established as a result of municipalities interpreting the State’s new statute, which goes into effect August 28, 2007.  Trees in rights-of-way where boxes may be placed are not specifically addressed in this amendment but provides direction for placement when better options are not practical.  The City has no legal liability should property values be affected negatively as a result of box placement.

 

Mayor Steinkamp opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak to the matter.  Seeing no one, he closed the public hearing and returned discussion to the Council.

 

Document No. 6719 was read.  Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9182.

 

2.         *AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 7, “BUSINESSES AND OCCUPATIONS GENERALLY”, LIBERTY CITY CODE – ORDINANCE (SECOND READING) No public hearing required for this matter

 

Assistant to the City Administrator Shawnna Funderburk reviewed the proposed amendment to the City Code, which would regulate video service providers.  This amendment, as is the previous amendment to the UDO, is in response to the passage of Senate Bill 284 affecting local regulation of video and cable franchises.  This amendment allows the City to collect five percent of gross revenues from video service providers with late payment interest amounts and customer service requirements; and establishes rights-of-way regulations, indemnification requirements, permit requirements and compliance requirements regarding all other applicable laws.

 

Document No. 6720 was read.  Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Parry seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9183.

 

IX.       ORDINANCES, CONTRACTS AND RESOLUTIONS

 

A.        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF VENDOR PAYMENTS FROM AUGUST 3, 2007 THROUGH AUGUST 17, 2007 – ORDINANCE

 

Council Member Brenton requested that Check Numbers 103350, 103467 and 103520 be removed and voted on separately.

 

Document No. 6724 was read.  Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion.

 

Council Member Parry asked about check number 103104 for primacy fees.  Public Works Director Steve Hansen stated he believed that was a fee charged by the Department of Natural Resources related to sewage discharge points but would check and provide a complete answer.

 

Council Member Brenton asked about a check to Commonwealth Title for “O&E”.  Mr. Hansen stated those are related to the H Highway waterline project and each ownership and encumbrances must be verified for the purposes of obtaining easements.  Mr. Brenton asked about a check noted for summer audit.  City Administrator Curt Wenson stated the staff would find out and report back to Council.  Mr. Brenton asked about the checks to Bartlett & West.  Mr. Hansen stated there were two storm sewer projects in the 2010 program and these were payments for engineering services related to that project.

 

Council Member Jenness noted a payment to Crossroads Chevrolet in Kearney and stated he would like to spend money locally whenever possible.  Mr. Hansen stated that payment had been for repair of a Liberty Access bus.

 

Vote on the motion was as follows:  Council Member Phillips – yes; Council Member Martin – yes; Council Member Brenton – yes; Council Member Foster – yes; Council Member Jenness – yes; Council Member Duncan – yes; Council Member Parry – yes; Council Member King – yes.  The motion carried unanimously; it was approved by the Chair and inscribed in Ordinance No. 9184.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve check numbers 103350, 103467 and 103520.  Council Member King seconded the motion.

 

Vote on the motion was as follows:  Council Member Phillips – yes; Council Member Martin – yes; Council Member Brenton – abstain, due to a potential conflict of interest; Council Member Foster – yes; Council Member Jenness – yes; Council Member Duncan – yes; Council Member Parry – yes; Council Member King – yes.  The motion carried 7-0-1; it was approved by the Chair and inscribed in Ordinance No. 9184.

 

B.         *ROGERS PLAZA, WEST OF A HIGHWAY

 

Planner Katherine Burr reviewed the final plat for Rogers Plaza.  The development is located northwest of A Highway, south and east of Place Liberté and south of Warren Hills Elementary School.  The site will have direct access to A Highway and access to existing sanitary sewer and water mains.  Sufficient area for stormwater detention will be provided.  The application substantially conforms to the requirements set forth in the UDO and the Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the final plat by a vote of 8-0.

 

Ms. Burr also reviewed the final development plan for Phase 1 of Rogers Plaza, which proposes three buildings with a total of 77,500 square feet.  Adequate on-site parking will be provided with 270 parking spaces in this phase.  Direct access is available to the site via A Highway and sanitary sewer and water will be provided by relocated existing site mains.  Stormwater will be detained on-site and released at an acceptable rate.  The main building will have a total size of 52,500 square feet and will house Rogers Sporting Goods.  The buildings will be constructed of brick, simulated stone, and Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) with metal coping and tile accents.  The landscape plan meets the UDO standards and proposes street trees along A Highway as well as throughout the site.  The detention area will be landscaped with natural vegetation.  The final development plan substantially conforms to the City’s Future Land Use Plan and the City’s site development standards.  The Planning & Zoning Commission unanimously recommended approval by a vote of 8-0.

 

In response to Council questions, staff noted that the drive lanes for the proposed development has drive lanes that are five feet wider and have a two-foot truck apron compared to the roundabout in the Triangle.  Stormwater retention would be improved by the development proposed.  The development is subject to the Roadway Development Tax but the applicant would receive a credit for its current space in the Triangle.  The Roadway Development Tax will be assessed at the building permit stage.  Sight line and buffering issues related to the other two buildings would be addressed when the final development plan for the second phase comes forward.

 

1.                   FINAL PLAT – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6725 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member King seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member King moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9185.

 

2.         FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1 – RESOLUTION

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the resolution.  Council Member King seconded the motion, which carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2309.

 

C.         *FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ADDITION AND CARWASH AT VALERO STATION LOCATED AT 609 SOUTH 291 HIGHWAY – RESOLUTION

 

City Planner Rebecca Wymore reviewed the final development plan for an addition and carwash at the Valero station.  The western addition is proposed to extend the current retail space by 600 square feet.  The addition to the south is proposed to include a car wash, with a total of 640 additional square feet.  The proposed additions would require a variance from the building setback line by approximately four feet for the location of the proposed car wash.  A rear fence and rear property landscaping provide an existing buffer.  The applicant is willing to add trees to the substantial existing landscaping if additional screening is considered necessary.  Exceptions to the setbacks are permitted by the UDO where unique conditions prevail.  The application substantially conforms to UDO requirements.  The Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the final development plan with the following stipulations:

 

1.       A variance shall be granted to permit the car wash addition to encroach over the building setback by five feet; and

2.       A variance shall be granted to allow the privacy fence and landscaping, as shall be maintained by the owner, to serve as the required buffer.

 

Questioned by Council, Staff noted that comments from residents adjacent to the property had been received more than a year ago, but none since the application was submitted.  As a final development plan does not require a public hearing, the City did not contact adjacent property owners about the submittal.  While the staff report noted a four foot encroachment would be needed, the stipulation includes a five-foot encroachment to assure the encroachment does not exceed what is allowed.  The dryer component of the car wash is to be housed inside the car wash building.  If Council wishes, it can add a requirement for additional landscaping between the back of the station and the residence or could require replacement of landscaping that fails.  This final development plan is subject to the Roadway Development Tax which would be applied by looking at the convenience store and car wash as separate uses.  The waste water from the car wash would be directed to the sanitary sewer system.

 

Council Member King moved to approve the resolution with the two stipulations proposed by staff.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion.  It was suggested by Council Member Brenton that communicating proposed uses such as this to adjacent residents would be appropriate, particularly if, as in this instance, there is a new property owner who is unaware of the application.

 

The motion carried unanimously and is inscribed in Resolution No. 2310.

 

D.                 ADOPTION OF LEGAL DEFENSE POLICY – RESOLUTION (continued from July 23, 2007)

 

Council Member Phillips moved to approve the resolution.  Council Member Duncan seconded the motion.

 

Following a lengthy period of questions and discussion by the Council, Council Member Martin moved to table consideration of the policy until additional information was made available.  Council asked on which policies this policy was patterned including the reasons why some exclusions were specifically noted in the policy.  Council also requested options regarding how to address other personal insurance coverage in the policy.

 

The motion to table the discussion for further information carried unanimously.

 

E.                  RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF LOCAL REGULATION FOR FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6726 was read.  Council Member King moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Phillips moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9186.

 

F.                  ACCEPTANCE OF SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EASEMENTS FOR THE HIGHWAY 291 OFFICE COMPLEX PROJECT – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6727 was read.  Council Member Phillips moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9187.

 

G.                 *CITY PHONE SYSTEM

 

Information Services Director Tony Sage reviewed information previously provided to Council related to a proposed new telephone system.  As a result of limitations and increasing failures of the 15-year-old system the equipment for which is no longer supported, staff sent out a Request for Proposals to seven vendors, four of which responded.  One of the four responses was deemed incomplete and not considered.  AT&T proposed a system that improves system access, eliminates staff time required to maintain an in-house system and increases flexibility and services associated with phone coverage for City facilities while reducing annual costs.  Savings include a reduction in long distance rate and maintenance.

 

Asked about the difference between the budgeted figures noted in the staff report compared to the published 2007 budget, it was noted that an amendment to the 2007 budget had been approved by Council this year.  The numbers in the staff report reflect the 2007 budget as amended.

 

Staff also noted that, as with any system, additional equipment would be needed to allow for the installation of the system, but this was not included in the RFP in order to be able to compare the systems proposed.  The purchase of equipment is proposed to be acquired through a lease/purchase agreement with UMB Bank to be paid over three years.  The lease/purchase plan is proposed in order to spread the cost of the equipment over time but the cost savings of the new system would offset the financing costs for the lease.

 

Once approved, it is anticipated the new system would be in place within 75 days of agreements being executed.  An advantage of the new system is that it can be installed in a parallel setup to the existing phone systems.

 

1.                   AGREEMENT WITH AT&T GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. FOR PURCHASE AND SERVICE – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6728 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Phillips moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried 7-1-0.  Council Member Parry voted in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9188.

 

2.                   AGREEMENT WITH AT&T DATACOMM FOR SERVICES AND EQUIIPMENT – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6729 was read.  Council Member King moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried 7-1-0.  Council Member Parry voted in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9189.

 

3.                   AGREEMENT WITH AT&T CORP. ACCEPTING PRICING SCHEDULES – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6730 was read.  Council Member Phillips moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member King seconded the motion, which carried 7-1-0.  Council Member Parry voted in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9190.

 

4.                   CONTRACT WITH AUS FOR INSTALLATION – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6731 was read.  Council Member King moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried 7-1-0.  Council Member Parry voted in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9191.

 

5.                   LEASE AGREEMENT WITH UMB BANK, N.A. – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6732 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member King seconded the motion, which carried 7-1-0.  Council Member Parry voted in opposition.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9192.

 

H.                 AMENDMENT TO SECTION 20-32, “DRIVERS LICENSE”, OF THE LIBERTY CITY CODE PERTAINING TO INTERMEDIATE DRIVERS – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6733 was read.  Council Member Phillips moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Martin moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion.

 

Police Lieutenant Tim Moore clarified that intermediate drivers are ages 16 to 18 and may drive with certain restrictions as to the passengers.  Learner’s permits are issued to drivers ages 15 ½ to 16.  The motion carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9193.

 

I.                    AMENDMENT TO SECTION 20-117, TAXICAB STANDS, BUS ZONES, AND SPECIAL RESTRICTED PARKING ZONES, OF THE LIBERTY CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT AREAS – ORDINANCE

 

Document No. 6734 was read.  Council Member Martin moved to waive the rules and consider the ordinance on first reading.  Council Member Phillips seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

Council Member Phillips moved to approve the ordinance.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion.

 

Staff clarified that the proposed amendment was due to four property owners in the Jewell District requesting the number of permits per residence be increased.

 

Council Member Brenton suggested the language in the amendment needed to be changed to clarify the fee for each permit is five dollars and moved to amend the pending motion to include “for each permit” in the amending ordinance language to accomplish that clarification.  Council Member Martin seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.

 

The motion to approve the ordinance as amended carried unanimously.  It was approved by the Chair and is inscribed in Ordinance No. 9194.

 

X.         OTHER BUSINESS

 

XI.               MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR

 

Mr. Wenson noted this is Assistant City Administrator Cynthia Boecker’s last formal meeting.  He thanked her for her service and for greatly easing the transition when he was hired as city administrator.  He added there would be a community reception for Ms. Boecker on Tuesday, September 4 and there would be no Council meeting that evening.

 

XII.            MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FROM MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

 

Council Member Duncan stated that he had first worked with Ms. Boecker while serving on the Park Board and her departure is Liberty’s loss and Lawrence’s gain.

 

Council Member King appreciated that the rental codes would be addressed in a future study session.

 

Council Member Martin asked if the City had applied for any of the public safety grants mentioned in a letter from Representative Sam Graves.  Fire Chief Gary Birch said application was made but announcements of the grants awarded would not be for some time.

 

Mayor Steinkamp noted that the recent meeting on light rail had concluded that the current proposal would not work due to rights-of-way issues.  Platte County’s map doesn’t include Clay County and Kansas municipalities and counties have indicated little or no support for bi-state funding.

 

Mayor Steinkamp announced a short recess in the meeting at 9:32 p.m.

 

Mayor Steinkamp reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m.

 

A.        MAYOR FORUMS REVIEW

 

Following a review of the four mayor forums, a change in format was proposed.  One forum during the day and a second in the evening would offer an opportunity for city-wide issues to be discussed.  Following the mayor’s presentation, an opportunity to break out into wards would be provided.  In the smaller group discussions, neighborhood issues could be reviewed by the council members.  Staff would float among the groups during this time, serving as resources to the smaller groups.

 

Improved methods of tracking issues and the City’s responses as well as ways to identify and communicate with participants and citizens regarding the forums are being developed.

 

XIII.     ADJOURNMENT

 

The meeting adjourned at 9:57 p.m.

 

 

                                                                                    __________________________________

                                                                                    Mayor

Attest:

 

 

_____________________________________

Deputy City Clerk